Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 12:53
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Engineers turn toxic ancient tomb fungus into anti-cancer drug - Phys.org
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
The unexpected mental health consequences of veganism, according to medical research - VegOut
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Israel warns ‘Tehran will burn’ as Netanyahu hints at regime change - Financial Times
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Popular Processed Foods Linked to Early Signs of Parkinson’s Disease - SciTechDaily
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Kate Beckinsale Sues Over Knee Injury on Croatian Set of ‘Canary Black’ - Variety
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.